W K Kellogg Foundation

Location: 1 Michigan Ave, Battle Creek, 49017 MI

EIN: 38-1359264

Write a Review

0%

100%

What was the overall relationship with the funder?

How many hours did the grant application process take?

4 hours

Median

33%

67%

How would you rate this funder's accessibility?

33%

67%

How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?

Important Information

2017 Deadlines:

Types of Grants Awarded:

Geographic Focus:

Interests/Priorities

Key Personnel

Financial Summary

For Fiscal Year

Total Assets:

Total Grants:

Change in Assets FY :

Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:

Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in

Largest Grant:

Smallest Grant:

Average Grant:

Top descriptors for this funder

4Bureaucratic3Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues2Difficult to work with2Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field2Risk averse

Advice from a Friend

W K Kellogg Foundation

Nov 05, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

Constant change and turnover. We started with one program officer and ended up with another. The racial equity, civic engagement, and tangential areas become confusing when you receive different messages. In our approach process, we found ourselves speaking to different program officers or directors. Truly Frustrating!

Cons

Bureaucratic, Risk averse

More Feedback

Oct 17, 2019

Reviewer 9994 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

We had to do a lot of education with our program officer -- on our issue area, on the racial equity lens (we are a racial justice organization), etc. They were ultimately supportive, but we had to go through the whole process again with a new program officer this year. When we needed an extension on the grant and additional funding, they were willing to work with us. This grant is a lot of work, but it was a large, multi-year one, so that helped take out some of the burden it otherwise created.

More Feedback

Aug 19, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2016

Make sure to write everything down that is communicated to you by the program officer. They have not followed through on what they say nor promise. Also, ask a lot of questions of their overall funding for your area - it seems to shift with no communication to grantees. Ask for their intent and process in writing.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with, Bureaucratic, Risk averse

More Feedback

Apr 01, 2019

Reviewer 6808 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2015

Well intended but poorly executed race equity lens. Very off-putting to have one of the many white program officers lecture us about equity in hiring. Commitment to issues seems to be personnel-driven, rather than institutional.

Cons

Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Bureaucratic

More Feedback

Oct 05, 2018

Reviewer 8616 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

We were only involved in one specific program at a very large foundation, but for our program area, the funder was super-disorganized. They asked for an extra, unplanned report mid-year. There were three different reports for a one-year project grant. The elements asked for in the reports didn't align with the proposal. We were given multiple conflicting report dates. And on and on.

Cons

Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with, Bureaucratic

More Feedback

Sep 22, 2017

Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

This funder seems to be having serious internal conflict and upheaval. They spent almost two years encouraging a "dream big" multiple organization collaborative project only to seriously undermine the community built by severely underfunding the proposal. It's very confusing, disruptive, and antagonizing to lead multiple organizations on for several months to then pull the rug out after so much time, energy, travel, money, staff investment.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field

More Feedback

Would you like to share your experiences about this funder?

funder logo

W K Kellogg Foundation