Cargill Foundation

5 survey respondents

Location: Po Box 5626, Minneapolis, 55440 MN

EIN: 41-6020221

Write a Review

80%

20%

What was the overall relationship with the funder?

How many hours did the grant application process take?

10 hours

Median

70%

30%

How would you rate this funder's accessibility?

70%

30%

How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?

Important Information

2017 Deadlines:

Types of Grants Awarded:

Geographic Focus:

Interests/Priorities

Key Personnel

Financial Summary

For Fiscal Year

Total Assets:

Total Grants:

Change in Assets FY :

Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:

Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in

Largest Grant:

Smallest Grant:

Average Grant:

Top descriptors for this funder

3Builds relationships3Friendly2Insightful2Likes site visits2Responsive1Bureaucratic1Culturally incompetent1Difficult to work with1Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues1Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field1Culturally sensitive1Openminded

Advice from a Friend

Cargill Foundation

May 07, 2025

Reviewer 870 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2025

We are grateful to have been invited to apply again. Their new application form took between 16-18 hours to complete - it was a lot of customized data. If you already collect granular demographic data (race, age, ethnicity, geography down to neighborhoods served), it might not take you as soon as it took us. Fortunately, the grant amount is worth the effort, but it's good to know how much effort it will take going in.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Culturally sensitive, Friendly, Openminded, Responsive

More Feedback

Aug 21, 2019

Reviewer 2341 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

It took a long time to get an introductory meeting with them, but the meeting was great and really focused on their priority areas, our priority areas, and potential areas of overlap. We didn't expect to be invited to apply, but I think volunteer engagement from Cargill staff was key for the invite.

Pros

Risk taker, Insightful, Builds relationships

More Feedback

Jun 07, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

Make sure you match their giving interests well. Pay attention to diversity. Have statistics to back-up your case for support. Takes time to build relationship.

Pros

Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits

More Feedback

May 17, 2019

Reviewer 827 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2018

I experienced the foundation's staff to be responsive, curious, and engaged. There's been some change in leadership in the past year or so, which sometimes means the future trajectory of the grantmaking is a bit unknown. It seems like the foundation is spending time in the community, genuinely listening to the experiences of nonprofits, and co-discovering possible ways the foundation can be a resource. If your work aligns with their funding priorities (child nutrition ages 2-12; increasing access to STEM education), I recommend reaching out to staff and having a conversation.

Pros

Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, Responsive

More Feedback

Jul 05, 2017

Reviewer 741 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2016

This funder is incredibly difficult to work with and approaches nonprofit work like a business investment, where numbers and ROI matter much more than people. I would avoid working with them, as they require twisting your mission to match increasingly-difficult criteria.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with, Culturally incompetent, Bureaucratic

More Feedback

Would you like to share your experiences about this funder?

funder logo

Cargill Foundation