4 survey respondents
Location: 5455 E High St Ste 111, Phoenix, 85054 AZ
EIN: 47-2975827
100%
0%
15 hours
Median
63%
38%
75%
25%
2017 Deadlines:
Types of Grants Awarded:
Geographic Focus:
For Fiscal Year
Total Assets:
Total Grants:
Change in Assets FY :
Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:
Largest Grant:
Smallest Grant:
Average Grant:
Reviewer 3604 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019
It is a total lottery.
Texas
Applied and not funded
2019
Average
Average
Do not send out grant rejections on a Friday at 5pm before a long weekend. really???
If you get rejected, they tell you to apply again. Don't do it!
They have a clear focus area.
10
Reviewer 4230 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019
Sprouts will consider a variety of programs related to nutrition, access to food, health literacy regarding nutrition. The staff is unbelievably supportive. If you have a program that aligns with the foundation's mission, definitely apply.
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Risk taker, Friendly, Builds relationships, "Gets" nonprofits and issues
Arizona
Current or former grantee
Funded for lesser amount
2019
Good
I encountered a problem with the online platform. No one should be shocked to learn that Blackbaud was absolutely no help. (I don't know why funders continue to use it. Even they complain about the customer service.) One of Sprouts' staff members went into my application to help me resolve the issue. Amazing support!
Good
Sprouts funds a lot of organizations in the U.S. and around the world. Kudos!
Move your application from Blackbaud to ZoomGrants, Award Alley, Foundant or any other platform. Blackbaud staff gives funders terrible advice as well.
As I mentioned, customer service is outstanding. I also appreciate that it will consider non-traditional nutrition programs.
More than 15
Grant Applicant - applied in 2018
Simple Application and good communication about awards.
Positive leader in the field, Friendly
California
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2018
Good
Good
The local branches and the foundation work really well together and seek programs that align with their mission
15
Grant Applicant - applied in 2017
They are new at funding through online grants, so it changes and they're learning each year. That's the good part. The bad part is they give vague guideline and then don't give an opportunity for feedback. We haven't been funded for 2 years and I don't know if we're aiming for the wrong thing or if it's just not a good fit.
Tennessee
Applied and not funded
2017
Bad
Not open to communication
Average
It's really hard to know because they don't communicate very well. They have written guidelines and focus areas, but we fit in those and haven't been funded so it's hard to know if what they're funding is reaching their goals.
Please give feedback, or at least a "this is not likely to be funded" section of the FAQ
they seem to learn
15
