Mile High United Way Inc

7 survey respondents

Location: 711 Park Avenue West, Denver, 80205 CO

EIN: 84-0404235

Write a Review

50%

50%

What was the overall relationship with the funder?

How many hours did the grant application process take?

12 hours

Median

50%

50%

How would you rate this funder's accessibility?

43%

57%

How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?

Important Information

2017 Deadlines:

Types of Grants Awarded:

Geographic Focus:

Interests/Priorities

Key Personnel

Financial Summary

For Fiscal Year

Total Assets:

Total Grants:

Change in Assets FY :

Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:

Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in

Largest Grant:

Smallest Grant:

Average Grant:

Top descriptors for this funder

3Difficult to work with3Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field2Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues2"Gets" nonprofits and issues2Friendly2Gives more than money2Responsive1Builds relationships1Insightful1Likes site visits1Openminded1Positive leader in the field

Advice from a Friend

Mile High United Way Inc

May 15, 2025

Grant Applicant - applied in 2025

MHUW has an unneccesarily time consuming and stressful grant process. I have worked with a huge range of funding partners for many years and they are by far one of the most difficult to work with, and that includes government funders. The application and award requirements are more intensive than they are for many much larger awards. Information availablility of funding and award sizes is not provided or inaccurate. Grantees are required to participate in multiple virtual meetings just to apply. If funding is awarded, they require two reports and a site visit each year for grants in the $10k range. For several years they required that part of your report be submitted in one portal, and part of your report be submitted in a completely different platform. Staff are condescending, and do not seem to grasp the challenges and workloads that service orgs and childcare facilities face, especially in the current political climate and in a city that is actively being targeted by the administration.

The past two grant cycles requried grantees to present to a panel of anonymous community reviewers. These are people on a Zoom with cameras off, no names provided. This was odd in 2023, but incredibly tone deaf and stress inducing in 2025. For organizations that still proudly offer DEI programs, serve migrants, support trans people, etc., this was deeply unsettling. Those of us actually working in communities right now are literally being threatened by the federal government, DOGE, and bigots in the community who feel emboldened to criticize nonprofits who still care about equity and inclusion. To have a funder require nonprofits to present organization details to completely anonymous people in the community puts nonprofits at risk, but if they don't want to participate they lose funding opportunities.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with

More Feedback

Nov 29, 2023

Grant Applicant - applied in 2023

Mile High United Way cut funding to many agencies this year or funded much less than was anticipated based on what they said the award amounts would be. Now they are sending out solicitation emails asking for donations for Colorado Gives Day. Are they a funder or are they a direct service agency? Seems to be a conflict of interest and speaks to other reviewers comments about lack of transparency.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Difficult to work with

More Feedback

Sep 06, 2023

Grant Applicant - applied in 2023

They made applicants participate in feedback sessions and jump through various hoops. The funding process does not seem transparent. Stated priority areas do not seem to match up with decision making. Strung out the decision making process much longer than necessary and instead of just sending an email or letter, made applicants sit through uncomfortable meetings online.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with

More Feedback

Mar 05, 2022

Grant Applicant - applied in 2021

I really appreciated the pre application training. They took the time to explain their questions and what a good response looks like. It was helpful to get the rubric. We were not successful but they continue to help us with trainings and even review applications we have to other funders.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Risk taker, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive

More Feedback

Feb 11, 2021 1

Grant Applicant - applied in 2020

MHUW understands the power dynamic between funders and nonprofits and exploits it. Their staff are regularly condescending to grantees. Their grant requirements are paternalistic (quarterly trainings on unrelated topics, only certain staff allowed to interact, etc).

More Feedback

Apr 01, 2019

Reviewer 6547 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2018

Get to know the people, and follow the guidelines carefully

Pros

Gives more than money, Insightful, "Gets" nonprofits and issues

More Feedback

Mar 11, 2019 1

Grant Applicant - applied in 2016

The process isn't too complicated, however, it's very clear that their funding scope can seem wide but actually be narrow in terms of what gets funded.

Pros

Friendly, Responsive

More Feedback

Would you like to share your experiences about this funder?

funder logo

Mile High United Way Inc