2 survey respondents
Location: 1425 4th Ave Ste 900, Seattle, 98101 WA
EIN: 91-2062197
50%
50%
28 hours
Median
0%
100%
25%
75%
2017 Deadlines:
Types of Grants Awarded:
Geographic Focus:
For Fiscal Year
Total Assets:
Total Grants:
Change in Assets FY :
Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:
Largest Grant:
Smallest Grant:
Average Grant:
Grant Applicant - applied in 2021
The foundation seems to prioritize support for groups that bring visibility to the CEO. If you don't impress or flatter her, your funding relationship is likely to suffer. Program staff seem to have very little autonomy over their portfolios.
Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Difficult to work with
Washington
Current or former grantee
Funded for lesser amount
2021
Bad
If you're not on the CEO's radar, you're not getting funded.
Bad
They seem to care more about academia than maintaining long-term funding for community organizing efforts.
Stop with the narcissism. Get back to your roots. Stop growing your endowment. Move more money to organizing groups. Increase payout to more than 5%.
PR
25
Grant Applicant - applied before 2014
This foundation demands adulation of the president or you're out.
They make some good grants. But they are also petty and mean, not just to grantees but to each other.
Positive leader in the field, Culturally sensitive
California
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
Before 2014
Bad
You need an "in" from someone who is in. It's like a royal court. Hard to get in, and everybody praises the monarch constantly.
Average
You need to see how much you are despised for your behavior, but fawned over because of your money.
Makes grants to social justice organizations.
30
