San Francisco Foundation

Location: 1 Embarcadero Ctr Ste 1400, San Francisco, 94111 CA

EIN: 01-0679337

Write a Review



What was the overall relationship with the funder?

How many hours did the grant application process take?

5 hours




How would you rate this funder's accessibility?



How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?

Important Information

2017 Deadlines:

Types of Grants Awarded:

Geographic Focus:


Key Personnel

Financial Summary

For Fiscal Year

Total Assets:

Total Grants:

Change in Assets FY :

Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:

Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in

Largest Grant:

Smallest Grant:

Average Grant:

Top descriptors for this funder

5Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field4Bureaucratic2Culturally sensitive2Positive leader in the field2Responsive2Unclear objectives1Difficult to work with1Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues1Risk averse1"Gets" nonprofits and issues1Friendly1Insightful

Advice from a Friend

San Francisco Foundation

Mar 27, 2018

Reviewer 7851 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

What a mess. They'd never put up with an agency they fund treating its own clients this way. A confusing process, a confusing website, a hideous new application site. Really, truly awful to navigate. And while their commitment to equity is great, maybe a community foundation should reserve a portion of its competitive funding for projects suggested by...the community? It's funny that a funder committed to equity has created a thoroughly top-down process where they dictate all the priorities. How about something that's a little more equitable in terms of sharing power with your non-profit partners?


Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues, Difficult to work with, Bureaucratic

More Feedback

Feb 20, 2018

Reviewer 1697 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

Try and find someone there to talk to before applying. And, if your contact leaves, good luck.


Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Bureaucratic, Risk averse

More Feedback

Aug 18, 2017

Professional in the field

Recent reorganization of priorities shows responsiveness and dedication to equity.


Positive leader in the field, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Responsive

More Feedback

Jul 12, 2017

Reviewer 758 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2017

Read through the website thoroughly to ensure alignment. The Foundation is currently focused on advancing racial and economic equity, which feels broad, but if you read details on their website, you will see there are very specific goals and outcomes.


Positive leader in the field, Culturally sensitive, Friendly, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Responsive

More Feedback

Jun 22, 2017

Reviewer 152 - Professional in the field

Talk to a program officer to learn more about their goals and targets. Just because it appears that your project fits their guidelines, it is worth finding out if they have any more specific criteria that doesn't appear in the guidelines.



More Feedback

May 01, 2017

Grant Applicant - applied in 2014

They have a very complicated internal process and sometimes they pass proposals around from desk to desk for months. Nobody wants a grant to come out of their own budget.


Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Bureaucratic

More Feedback

Jun 15, 2016

Grant Applicant - applied in 2015

They are very bad at communicating with agencies that want to apply to them. In our case, we were trying to find out if they were going to renew our donor-advised funding. We got absolutely no reply to multiple emails; then, out of the blue, a check came in the mail, with no explanation of what it was for or how they arrived at the amount.


Funding received on time


Unclear objectives, Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field

More Feedback

Jun 15, 2016

Grant Applicant - applied in 2010

They have very narrowly defined their funding objectives (which change every few years) and are not very open to thinking beyond those objectives. Plus, the program officer in our funding area is not approachable or friendly. They also have eliminated the open application round completely for 2016, and the previous model required extension documentation for relatively small grants ($10k)


Unclear objectives, Only gives 1year grants, Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field

More Feedback

Would you like to share your experiences about this funder?

funder logo

San Francisco Foundation