M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Location: 703 Broadway St Ste 710, Vancouver, 98660 WA

EIN: 23-7456468

Write a Review

76%

24%

What was the overall relationship with the funder?

How many hours did the grant application process take?

40 hours

Median

81%

19%

How would you rate this funder's accessibility?

81%

19%

How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?

Important Information

2017 Deadlines:

Types of Grants Awarded:

Geographic Focus:

Interests/Priorities

Key Personnel

Financial Summary

For Fiscal Year

Total Assets:

Total Grants:

Change in Assets FY :

Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:

Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in

Largest Grant:

Smallest Grant:

Average Grant:

Top descriptors for this funder

24Builds relationships21Responsive20"Gets" nonprofits and issues20Likes site visits18Friendly17Positive leader in the field14Gives more than money13Insightful11Culturally sensitive9Openminded8Risk taker7Risk averse

Advice from a Friend

M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Sep 06, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

Understand your needs and have the ability to communicate them.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive

More Feedback

Sep 06, 2019

Reviewer 8940 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

Reach out to their program staff before applying. They are always helpful and willing to answer questions about your projects chances for success. The LOI process is fairly simple. Once your LOI is accepted and you are invited to apply, the real work begins. It was the most rigorous grant application I've ever worked on. We worked with our Finance Director and a Grant Writer to help us submit all the necessary materials in a timely fashion. Their website is a wonderful tool for understanding their process, requirements and forms. The next step in the process is a meeting with your Program Officer. Ours was incredibly helpful and always open to answering our questions. I felt very supported by her through the process. In the end, our request was approved and it was a very generous amount that was critical to our ability to reach our project goal. I am so grateful to the Trust for the thoughtful process and the instrumental investment in our work.

Pros

Friendly, Builds relationships, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Responsive

More Feedback

Sep 05, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

It was helpful to schedule a phone call with a program officer to talk through initial ideas. Do some planning and preparation before the call to make the most of the time.

Pros

Risk taker, Builds relationships, Responsive

More Feedback

Sep 04, 2019

Reviewer 3033 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

In applying for the M.J. Murdock grant I found that following using the website as a resource and guide was very effective. It is very important to complete this application correctly and completely and make sure you meet the guidelines for applicants from the beginning. I also found that all of the staff I spoke with or ask for information from were very professional and helpful. They answered my questions completely and in a way that made me believe they wanted us to be successful. Again, I can't stress enough that replies to my questions were very prompt and helpful. Don't hesitate to seek more information but be sure you have done your homework first.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive

More Feedback

Sep 04, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

Great opportunity to build capacity through a significant, mulit-year grant. The grant application takes a large amount of work, and the process is about nine-months, so planning ahead is critical. They like to fund new positions that can grow capacity of organization and have a strong sustainability plan for beyond the life of the grant.

Pros

Friendly, Likes site visits

More Feedback

Jul 01, 2019

Reviewer 5489 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2015

It used to be that you could write an LOI to Murdock and if they invited you to write a grant proposal, you had a 90% chance of funding. That has changed, and they are turning down more proposals. It's frustrating, because to write a good Murdock grant is a very difficult process. I've had a staff person tell me a grant had a very good chance of funding, only to find out later that it didn't have any chance.

Cons

Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field, Culturally incompetent, Risk averse

More Feedback

Response from M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Jul 10, 2019

We appreciate this feedback and are saddened to hear that you didn’t have a positive experience with our grant review process. We are constantly working to improve our application and review process and we will do our best to learn from this and other feedback we regularly receive from individuals and organizations. In our most recent Center for Effective Philanthropy survey, applicants, both those who received funding from the Trust and those that did not, gave the Trust top marks for our commitment to ensuring clear, quality communication throughout our process and they consider this an asset as they prepared their application. For example, we do try and make staff available for calls, emails, and meetings to help applicants prepare for and present a strong proposal. We also spend considerable effort ensuring that our website is full of helpful instructions, samples, tips and other resources to support applicants through the process. That said, no process will ever be perfect and we are always looking for ways to provide an even better experience.

Regarding the connection between approval of an LOI and approval of a grant application, the Trust has never approved anything close to 90-95% of the applications it receives, nor have we indicated such a high level of success should be expected. The Letter of Inquiry is just the first stage in our vetting process and we do come across any number of challenges that might lead to declining an application as we get into a more detailed review of the proposal. In all our communications we make it clear that the process is competitive and successful grantees should ensure that their organization is prepared before submitting their application and if they discover questions that need to be addressed, there are options available before hitting “submit.” Program directors give applicants the opportunity to defer or withdraw and later resubmit their application if the organization needs more time to plan or prepare for the proposed project. We do our best to avoid telling organizations what to do; however, we will encourage best practices and report out what we know others in the sector to be doing. We are rooting for every nonprofit we meet with and want to see every organization funded, but we also believe we have a responsibility to fund projects that have the best chance to uplift a nonprofit and not proposals that could turn into a burden down the road.

The Trust invests in the capacity of a wide range of organizations doing great work in communities around the Pacific Northwest, including a small portion that are faith-based. However, all organizations go through the same application and review process and are held to the same high standards.

Jun 26, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

Although the application is rigorous, the grants officers and website provide a lot of really helpful information. Be sure to be prompt and professional when working with the person assigned to your grant.

Pros

Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, Responsive

More Feedback

Jun 26, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

The grants manager we worked with was genuinely interested in helping us increase our chances of receiving a grant from the Trust. We implemented their suggestions and were recently notified that the project was approved by the trustees! The application took quite a bit of thought and was very thorough, so it's very clear the Trust funds projects that they believe are sustainable and realistic and will truly make a difference. The resources on the Trust's website were helpful in guiding us through the application process and required documents.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Risk taker, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive

More Feedback

Jun 19, 2019

Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

The team is really a partner in the process - When you approach, do your homework in the grant areas and have a fleshed out idea. However, don't be afraid to share some other things in your pipeline and how they relate to your larger goals. This is a funder that cares about your institution.

Pros

Positive leader in the field, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Responsive

More Feedback

Jun 17, 2019

Reviewer 6787 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2019

In our limited view based on our own experience and that of a partner organization, the application process is rigorous but the structure and intensity of the process definitely varies depending on the program officer.

Pros

Gives more than money, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Responsive

More Feedback

Would you like to share your experiences about this funder?

funder logo

M J Murdock Charitable Trust