What was the overall relationship with the funder?
How many hours did the grant application process take?
0 hours
Median
17%
83%
How would you rate this funder's accessibility?
21%
79%
How successfully do you think the funder is accomplishing its current philanthropic goals?
Important Information
2017 Deadlines:
Types of Grants Awarded:
Geographic Focus:
Interests/Priorities
Key Personnel
Financial Summary
For Fiscal Year
Total Assets:
Total Grants:
Change in Assets FY :
Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:
Sample Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits in
Largest Grant:
Smallest Grant:
Average Grant:
Top descriptors for this funder
6Bureaucratic5Difficult to work with5Doesn't "get" nonprofits and issues5Inadvertently exerts negative influence in the field4Risk averse3Culturally incompetent2Worth the time to pitch1Not worth the time to pitch1Unclear objectives1Likes site visits
It was very confusing to approach them- they did not seem to know who I should talk to, or what their funding priorities were, or if we were even eligible.
I have no idea what is going on with the Cargill Foundation! A lot of areas are still "under development" and it would be great to learn more about what is going and how we can apply for funding to those areas.
