30 survey respondents
Location: 65 Merrimon Avenue #1042, Asheville, 28801 NC
EIN: 95-4664361
100%
0%
10 hours
Median
95%
5%
89%
11%
2017 Deadlines:
Types of Grants Awarded:
Geographic Focus:
For Fiscal Year
Total Assets:
Total Grants:
Change in Assets FY :
Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:
Largest Grant:
Smallest Grant:
Average Grant:
Reviewer 7991 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
It seemed important to demonstrate existing competency and then share how you plan to expand/ scale/ grow from there.
"Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive
California
Current or former grantee
Funded for lesser amount
2023
Good
Good
I wish the foundation was more transparent about its anticipated funding amounts during the proposal and renewal process
Proposal, renewal, and reporting processes are straightforward. Board questions are direct and specific.
9
Grant Applicant - applied in 2021
As always, it is important that your request aligns with the foundation's objectives. It is also helpful if you have a relationship with one of its board members
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Friendly, Responsive
Ohio
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2021
Good
I am not qualified to answer this question.
The funder does a great job of being accessible and answering questions to ensure our request aligns with objectives.
Less than 5
Reviewer 5638 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
NA
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues
California
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2023
Good
Good
5
Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
If able, contact the executive director prior to applying. Make sure your project is well-aligned with the intent of the Foundation and that your proposal stands out, as funding will be competitive.
Friendly, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Responsive
Ohio
Grant currently pending
2023
Good
Average
I do not have enough information to respond to this question. I am not familiar with the Foundation's grantees or funded projects.
The "Priorities Link" in the 2023 grant application instructions was very helpful. I have previously found it difficult to find information about the Foundation's mission, history, values, and priorities.
I appreciate the executive director's transparency during the application process and feedback on declined proposals. It is not always offered by Foundations, and it is very helpful for applicants.
6
Reviewer 9557 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2021
LB is in a season where they are still figuring out what they want to do, so it makes it difficult to pitch a project to them. I first learned of them via GrantStation, and only had their profile info to go on. I emailed the foundation our 400-word max intro and was invited to submit a full proposal. It was declined and I asked for feedback. The feedback was honest and straightforward, but it made me wonder why we were ever allowed to submit a full application in the first place.
Responsive
Texas
Applied and not funded
2021
Good
The foundation was responsive to inquiries and provided feedback after our application was declined. I really appreciated that.
Average
I think they are still trying to discover what their philanthropic goals are.
It would really help the grantee community if they had a website to clearly define their goals and funding priorities.
16
Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
The process of applying was pretty standard. It consumed 3-4 hours and required multiple follow-up calls. After the initial call, the approval process was fast.
Positive leader in the field, Builds relationships, "Gets" nonprofits and issues
Florida
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2023
Good
Average
I am still unsure of the funders philanthropic goals and priorities.
Make your priorities and interests clear.
Communicate the value of letting organizations decide what's best for them.
10 to 15 hours
Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
LB Research communicated well upon receiving our inquiry, inviting us for a full application, and the reason for declining.
Friendly, Responsive
North Dakota
Applied and not funded
2023
Good
Good
0
Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
Reach out to staff prior to submitting.
Positive leader in the field, Friendly, Builds relationships, Openminded, Responsive
New York
Applied and not funded
2023
Good
Good
Communication
10
Reviewer 6746 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2021
The staff at the foundation was very helpful in our proposal efforts, offering clear and concise guidelines. They also were very communicative around the process and offered valuable guidance to help us submit a successful application.
Builds relationships, Responsive
California
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2021
Good
Good
5 to 10 hours
Grant Applicant - applied in 2023
Executive Director has been accessible and responsive
Massachusetts
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2023
Good
0