Location: 1250 Hancock St Ste 701n, Quincy, 02169 MA
EIN: 04-2755323
98%
2%
10 hours
Median
94%
6%
91%
9%
2017 Deadlines:
Types of Grants Awarded:
Geographic Focus:
For Fiscal Year
Total Assets:
Total Grants:
Change in Assets FY :
Amount of Grants to Minnesota Nonprofits:
Largest Grant:
Smallest Grant:
Average Grant:
Grant Applicant - applied in 2020
It's helpful to have a call with the funder to learn more and to introduce the work. Also, racial equity needs to be at the heart of your work.
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Risk taker, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Likes site visits, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive
New Hampshire
Current or former grantee
Other
2020
Good
Good
we would like to see Nellie Mae have a critical eye to building cross-race, cross-place, cross-class funding opportunities towards racial justice in education.
Previous grants with Nellie Mae we were funded at the full amount. This grant we have not yet heard.
Nellie Mae is the only funder who funds organizing at a level that allows you to focus more on the work and less on chasing more grants/funding.
32
Grant Applicant - applied in 2020
Take advantage of the phone call opportunity with a grant officer!
Risk taker, "Gets" nonprofits and issues
Massachusetts
Grant currently pending
Other
2020
Good
Average
Application pending
Keeps the application process as streamlined as possible and understands the value of nonprofit staff time
5
Reviewer 7970 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2018
Nellie Mae team are approachable and transparent so I would recommend requesting an in person meeting.
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Builds relationships, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive
Rhode Island
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2018
Good
Good
The foundation just rolled out their funding priorities and it completely aligns with their new mission, vision and values. The next and most important phase is implementation.
Implement with fidelity.
This funder is extremely responsive to community needs.
12
Reviewer 7606 - Grant Applicant - applied in 2020
This new approach is very open ended which carries its pros and cons. The pros are that it allows a lot of freedom, and it's stated that they are accepting of any past information or proposal as a narrative, but in a situation like ours where this wasn't the case and building a submission from ground up, it almost seemed overly daunting because there was minimal direction.
Granted [pun intended], this is a subjective experience and now that we've experienced it once it makes it a lot easier and more inviting, be prepared to well in advance have numerous readers and eyes on proposal and thought partnership on supplemental material to get your point across on such an open ended approach.
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Risk taker, Culturally sensitive, Friendly, Builds relationships, "Gets" nonprofits and issues, Openminded, Responsive
Rhode Island
Grant currently pending
2020
Good
Good
In approaches like this last one, it is a fantastic practice of creating a more inclusive process. But I wonder, with a small, invite only RFP like this one that is so open ended in it's approach, and already having a relationship with the orgs, would an intentional pre-conversation of served well with each org? or would that of just hindered the process?
They really are starting to create an inclusive landscape with an intention of naming race as an issue. And this new approach is definitely more welcoming.
5
Grant Applicant - applied in 2020
-
Positive leader in the field, Gives more than money, Culturally sensitive, Builds relationships, Openminded, Responsive
Maine
Grant currently pending
2020
Good
Good
Tremendous thought leadership!
10
Grant Applicant - applied in 2017
focus on organizing!
Positive leader in the field, Risk taker, Culturally sensitive, Insightful, Friendly, Builds relationships, Openminded, Responsive
Massachusetts
Current or former grantee
Funded for amount requested
2017
Bad
Bad
Very responsive to questions, feedback, support requests, including additional funds at time. Appreciate flexibility in changing budget.
20
